Jump to content

Teachers/professors' e-teaching competencies/Maturity levels

From OESI Wiki
Revision as of 11:54, 4 November 2024 by Neska (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Level 1== Teaching competencies are mostly class/campus based ==Level 2== Teachers - innovators shares their experience, mostly informally <br> Best practices are shared <br> Experiments comtimue <br> Special requirements for e-teachers appear ==Level 3== Teacher's preparation roadmap exists <br> Instructor’s training sessions established and recorded <br> Teachers are provided with clear instructions and support <br> Pre-class trainings on methodology and tools f...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Level 1

Teaching competencies are mostly class/campus based

Level 2

Teachers - innovators shares their experience, mostly informally
Best practices are shared
Experiments comtimue
Special requirements for e-teachers appear

Level 3

Teacher's preparation roadmap exists
Instructor’s training sessions established and recorded
Teachers are provided with clear instructions and support
Pre-class trainings on methodology and tools for teachers are introduced
Trainer's inspections and audits are regular
Ability to apply antiplagiarism tools

Level 4

Teachers/professors react to students’ inquiries in appropriate time, which is aligned with education tempo, tasks and audience
Example: BBA and MBA; or Uni and Professional training center
Video recordings are available in common formats with alignment to EO’s and students’ Internet bandwidth
For Live and Hybrid students live teams are formed in VLE to work together
Labs, Assignments, practical works are closely linked to current best practices in the subject area Training materials are mostly interactive and involving
Ability to work with GPT tools and oppose cheating with GPT

Level 5

All features and attributes of Level 4 AND
instant search for new approach integrating innovative methodological and technical facilities
Fail fast approach is welcome
Strong policies of advanced tools implementation and opposing (i.e. GPT as an assistant, but not cheating with GPT tools)